The MPRE, Complete
Sign in

Conflicts of Interest · 12-18% of the exam

10.1.2Client information, gifts, literary rights, financial assistance, and proprietary interest in litigation (Rules 1.8(b), (c), (d), (e), and (i))

On this page
  • Rule 1.8(b) — Client information (Model Rule 1.8(b))
  • Rule 1.8(c) — Gifts from clients (Model Rule 1.8(c))
  • Rule 1.8(d) — Literary and media rights (Model Rule 1.8(d))
  • Rule 1.8(e) — Financial assistance in litigation (Model Rule 1.8(e))
  • Rule 1.8(i) — Proprietary interest in litigation (Model Rule 1.8(i))

Why

These five sub-rules address distinct channels of self-dealing beyond direct business transactions.

Plain English

Each prohibition is separately tested with its own scope and exceptions. Financial assistance sees the most exam coverage; the three eligible-client tiers are the primary trap.

Rule

Rule 1.8(b) — Client information (Model Rule 1.8(b))

A lawyer shall not use information relating to the representation to the disadvantage of the client unless the client gives informed consent or the MRPC otherwise permits.

  • Comment [5]: Example: a lawyer who learns through representation that a client intends to purchase a specific parcel of land may not purchase that parcel first.

Rule

Rule 1.8(c) — Gifts from clients (Model Rule 1.8(c))

A lawyer shall not solicit any substantial gift from a client, including a testamentary gift, and shall not prepare an instrument giving the lawyer or a relative of the lawyer a substantial gift — unless the client is related to the lawyer or to the gift recipient.

  • "Related" includes spouse, child, grandchild, parent, grandparent, or another relative or individual with whom the lawyer or client maintains a close familial relationship.

  • Comment [6]: a lawyer may accept an unsolicited gift, even a substantial one, though it may be voidable under the undue influence doctrine.

  • The prohibition targets soliciting and drafting the instrument — not accepting.

  • Fiduciary appointment (Comment [8])

    Rule 1.8(c) does not bar a lawyer from seeking to have the lawyer, or a partner or associate, named executor of the client's estate or to another potentially lucrative fiduciary position. That appointment is tested instead under Rule 1.7(a)(2) where there is a significant risk that the lawyer's interest in obtaining it will materially limit the lawyer's independent professional judgment in advising the client on the choice of executor or other fiduciary (Chapter 8).

Rule

Rule 1.8(d) — Literary and media rights (Model Rule 1.8(d))

Prior to the conclusion of representation, a lawyer shall not make or negotiate an agreement giving the lawyer literary or media rights to a portrayal or account based substantially on information relating to the representation.

  • Rationale: media rights give the lawyer a financial stake in the outcome that can conflict with the client's interest in settling.

  • A lawyer may acquire such rights after the matter is entirely concluded, including all appeals.

Rule

Rule 1.8(e) — Financial assistance in litigation (Model Rule 1.8(e))

A lawyer shall not provide financial assistance to a client in connection with pending or contemplated litigation. Exceptions:

  1. May advance court costs and litigation expenses, repayment may be contingent on the outcome — available for any client. Bail, living expenses and personal loans are not court costs or expenses of litigation;
  2. May pay court costs and litigation expenses outright (no repayment obligation) for an indigent client;
  3. May provide modest gifts for food, rent, transportation, medicine, and other basic living expenses to an indigent pro bono client — available to any lawyer representing an indigent client pro bono, whether directly, through a nonprofit legal services or public interest organization, or through a law school clinical or pro bono program (no organizational channel is required) — but may not promise, assure or imply the availability of such gifts prior to retention or as an inducement to continue the client-lawyer relationship after retention, may not seek or accept reimbursement from the client, a relative of the client or anyone affiliated with the client, and may not advertise willingness to provide them.
    • Note (fee-shifting): Eligibility for court-awarded fees under a fee-shifting statute does not disqualify an indigent pro bono client from the modest-gifts tier — but the modest-gifts tier is unavailable in other litigation where the lawyer may earn a contingent fee, or where fees may be available under a contractual fee-shifting provision (Comment [13]).

Rule

Rule 1.8(i) — Proprietary interest in litigation (Model Rule 1.8(i))

A lawyer shall not acquire a proprietary interest in the cause of action or the subject matter of litigation the lawyer is conducting for a client. Exceptions:

  • A lien authorized by law to secure the lawyer's fee or expenses (attorney's lien); and

  • A contingent fee in a civil case, subject to the reasonableness and writing requirements of Rule 1.5.

  • Note: this prohibition applies only to litigation. A patent lawyer may accept an ownership interest in a patent as payment for drafting the application, but not for litigating an infringement suit involving that same patent. The civil-case limit belongs to the contingent fee under (i)(2) alone: a contingent repayment of an advanced litigation expense is paragraph (e)'s business, not paragraph (i)'s (Comment [19]), and is not limited to civil cases.

Example 1

Ex. 1

Elena faces wire fraud charges and retains Farid. Farid advances the cost of an expert forensic-accounting report contingent on outcome and pays three months of rent from his own funds with no repayment expectation. While the appeal is pending, he negotiates a publishing contract based substantially on the case details. The expert-report advance is permissible: it is a litigation expense, and contingent advances are available to any client. The rent payment violates Rule 1.8(e). Rent is a living expense, reachable only under tier three, which requires both indigency and pro bono representation; Farid was retained. The book deal violates Rule 1.8(d) because representation has not concluded. Strip Farid's three moves down to the question under each: repayment, indigency, and whether the appeal is over.

A lawyer may accept a client's gift; only soliciting the gift and drafting the gift instrument are prohibited. Outright payment of litigation expenses requires indigency; a contingent advance doesn't. Literary rights acquired after final judgment with all appeals waived are permitted because representation has concluded.

Tip

Questions · 6

Q 01ch10-e03

Question 1 of 6 · Rule 1.8(b)

Attorney handled zoning work for Developer for several years. While preparing a rezoning petition, Attorney learned from Developer's internal files that Developer planned to assemble a shopping center and needed one particular corner parcel to complete the block. Developer had not yet approached the owner of that parcel. Attorney said nothing to Developer, bought the corner parcel in Attorney's own name that month, and later offered to resell it to Developer at three times what Attorney had paid. Developer never consented to any such use of the information and learned of the purchase only afterward. Was Attorney's purchase of the parcel proper?

Keys 1 to 4 choose.

Press 1 to 4 to choose · Enter to check
10.1.2 Client information, gifts, literary rights, financial assistance, and proprietary interest in litigation (Rules 1.8(b), (c), (d), (e), and (i)) · Chapter 10 · Open Bar Review